logo for digital-photography-tips.net
[?] Subscribe To This Site

XML RSS
Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My MSN
Subscribe with Bloglines


Home
My Story
Newsletter
Learn Photography Quick Tips!
Tutorials
Beginners
Articles
Exposure Tips
History of Digital
Terminology
Find it Fast!
Making Money Photography Business
Wedding Checklist
Wedding Photography
Ebooks
Photo Themes Black and White Tips
Flower Photography
Travel Photography
Night Photography
Contribute Submit Photos
Contact us
Other photo areas Printing Tips
Comparison Guide
Software
Resources
Stereoscopic (3D)
d - p - t . net
New Year 2010
Site search
LEFT for digital-photography-tips.net
 

Cook Islands

by Gavin Dohnt
(South Australia)

This photo is looking back at the main island and the photo is half under water and half out.



(For convenience, all links below open in new windows)
This is an unusual photo. Half in the water, and half out. Clearly Gavin has a waterproof camera up his sleeve!

The fact that the camera was half in and half out has had one immediate benefit – we can see through the water, straight down to the ripples in the sand on the sea bed.

Due to the reflections at sea, this can only usually be achieved using a polarising filter. So well done there!

Now, I’m sure most people will be drawn to the lens flare in the right of the photo. Looks almost like some sort of UFO has just touched down!

Lens flare can be difficult to avoid. If you are photographing into the sun, unless you shade the end of your lens (using your hand will work) you will inevitably get lens flare.

It manifests itself in two ways – first, an overall haze in the photo, and second, as bright lights across the image.

There are two choices here, either work to remove the flare (by shading the lens), or work to include it. Gavin has chosen the second option, and I think it has worked well. The flare has caused a definite point of interest over on that right hand side. Even if it is a little futuristic looking!

There is another aspect of this photo that I am drawn to – the clouds. The cloud on the right suffers from blown highlights, and all detail is lost in them. It would have been good (though perhaps not possible) to have underexposed the photo a little, in order to retain some detail in those clouds, and then brightened the scene up a little using software afterwards.

All in all, I like this photo. It’s different, and interesting. Well done Gavin, and thanks for the submission!


Ed.

Want more tips? Get our recommended eBook.
Read a hands on review here


Click here to read or post comments.







digital-photography-tips.net
Develop your photographic memory
Discover your photographic memory - learn the secrets to unlock your hidden brain power!

Top 5 most popular pages:

1.
Photography tutor pages

2.
Wedding photography checklist NEW!

3.
Using shutter speed creatively

4.
The rule of thirds

5.
Photography Articles



Pearls from the submissions:

picture of bear grassBear Grass
bumble bee in marigoldsBumblebee in the Marigolds
white flowerWhite Frills



Stop wasting time and money on digital photography courses and books.
Learn at your own pace and time.
Over 4,000 pages!

Download FREE demo.


Return to digital-photography-tips.net home


footer for digital photography page